Traveling to Bahrain and being in this Kingdom off the East coast of Saudi Arabia was a fantastic experience, but I did not see much of this interesting country.
From the vantage point from the roof of the hotel I was staying and giving the training in, I got an impression of the environment. A modern country, still being developed at a high rate, with a high level of foreign workers. Even the police seemed to be foreign, and I was told not good Arabic speakers.
There were parts of the Kingdom of Bahrain I did not see, and thus are not shown here, and I understand that some of those parts are very, very poor, leading to unrest, which I had never heard of.
Bahrain is a modern country with new buildings
Very new, modern buildings are being built, extending out from the city center. This one near to an exhibition center seen on the left of the picture.
Not a hill in sight in Bahrain
From the roof of the hotel I could not see one hill, Bahrain seems so flat, but I am assured that there is one hill on the Kingdom island.
Flat roof of Middle Eastern homes
The flat roofs of the houses in sharp contrast to the tiled roofs of the UK, but then there is not much need in Bahrain of inverted “V” roofs due to lake of snow and rain.
A good sand football pitch
Not so good pitch
A football pitch near to the hotel, not a blade of grass to be seen. I remember playing a game of football whilst I was based in Saudi Arabia on a similar pitch. It was the most difficult game I have ever played in, I seemed to sink to my knees in the sand as I tried to move or kick the ball, which did not bounce or run as it would on grass. We, an expatriate side, lost the match against a Saudi national side.
As seen previously, we all process information using our submodalities, (click to read), our five external and internal senses.
Many differences with the submodalities will be found when asking about or eliciting likes and dislikes, or strategies, some minor, some major. For example, it could be that the something they like has sound, and the something they dislike has no sound. Major difference.
If we can give the strategy of the something we do not like, the same submodalities of the strategy we like to do, we change the submodalities, it has been found that our perception of, or the way we process the strategy of that something we dislike, it will change, thus should we so wish, we can do that something.
Elicit or establish, as above, the submodalities of the “liked” activity, and especially the place of the picture.
Now elicit or establish the submodalities of the “disliked” activity, and again the location of the picture.
Image a hook, way out into space, so small and far away, it is virtually impossible to see.
Attach an elastic band to the hook and to the picture of the “disliked” image. It is important to take the image as reality, and physically do this.
Pull the “disliked” picture towards the client, let them hold the picture.
Release the “disliked” picture, so that it flies out into space, getting smaller and smaller towards the “space hook”, until the “disliked” picture disappears.
SWISH it away, making the sound, “SWWWIIIIIIISSSH“.
Then see the picture of the “disliked” strategy, fly back, SWISHing into the same location of the “liked” activity or strategy, and at the same time changing, taking-on, the submodalities of the “liked” activity, for example making the picture colourful, (V), putting sound into the image if there was none, (A), changing the feelings (K), if these were the major differences.
Test the work and ecology, (is it acceptable), and you will find change will take place.
The SWISH Pattern can be used for unwanted behaviours, compulsive or obsessive behaviours, such as an uncontrollable desire to bite nails, smoke, eating certain foods, or habits.
There are many examples and methods of implementing the SWISH Pattern, but the above example brings quick and easy resolve and change.
Content Reframing
There are sub headings of reframing in NLP, Context Reframing and Content Reframing.
Content reframing can be used when someone reacts to something that is said, a thought, a situation, something happens and reaction happens to them that they do not want or like, or the reaction is inappropriate.
Perhaps a loved one does not telephone at an agreed time and the waiting person says “I feel bad when I have to wait for a phone call.” A reframe could be :- “That will give you time to wash your hair.” or “Perhaps you can find someone else to talk to.”
A content reframe can be used to change a negative idea or belief into something useful.
“I do not like being bald.” A reframe could be :- “At least you save money on shampoo.”
By reframing a belief, it gives the opportunity to perceive things in a different way, to have choice.
Care must be taken when reframing, as they could cause offense if over done.
Context Reframing
There are sub headings of reframing in NLP, Context Reframing and Content Reframing that can be helpful.
Context reframing can be used when someone is making generalised comparisons, where the action, thought or behaviour is inappropriate or wrong. Perhaps that wrong belief could be used in another context.
A person may say “I talk too much.” This can be reframed by changing the context where talking too much would be good or an advantage, and a reply could be, “You could be a good after-diner speaker.”
By changing the context, it will change the meaning, and could become a resource.
Context reframing can take an undesirable or undesired attribute and finds a different situation where it would be valuable, leaving the meaning of the thought or behaviour the same.
Reframing – NLP terms
In previous articles in this blog, we have seen that the Map is not the Territory, and that when we think about a cat sitting on a mat, the cat and mat will be different for each and every person.
What we understand of the world we exist in, our experiences, are influenced by our beliefs, culture, values, likes and dislikes and our previous experiences. The context or content of our understanding.
If I say the word “holiday“, you will bring back a memory, see a picture in the mind of a previous holiday, maybe of a Caribbean exotic holiday, a skiing holiday, a family holiday is Blackpool (well known holiday resort in the UK). But, if you have never been to the Caribbean, skiing or to Blackpool, you would not have even thought of them, you will create your own holiday.
Even if you had been to the holidays above, would you have had the same experiences as me? Would you have seen the same things? Even if we had done the same things at the same time, we would have had different understandings, different memories. See previous blogs on George Miller and how the mind deletes, distorts and generalises.
It is said :- The meaning of an experience is dependent upon the context.
By reframing we can change the way we see, understand or perceive an event or belief, and thus change the outcome, meaning or understanding.
If the meaning or understanding changes, the response that we give will change too, as in the articles on CBT and HCBT as with NLP, they seek to change the way the client understands the now, the situation.
A reframe can be in the form of a joke. My wife is a martial artist in cooking, one chop and you are dead. It makes the listener rethink, put another meaning on what is believed or initially thought.
If as a practitioner you can give a client who had only one belief, another alternative belief to consider, then the client has choice.
Perhaps the only way to get to the shops is to go by car, you know no other way, and if the car breaks down, how are you going to get to the shops? The only way you know is to travel by car.
If I show you a way to get to the shops by bus, now you have two ways.
If I show you a way by walking, now you have three ways.
If I show you a way ………
In other words, the more choices we have in the way we believe or think about something, the better we have in coping with that something or situation.
That yes, a client may think that the aircraft they are about to get on will crash, if we can give a stronger alternative belief that the aircraft is safe, and that they will enjoy the experience, that belief will take hold and they will fly.
We can do this by reframing, changing the context or content of the belief, by changing the idea, belief or frame of reference, by issuing another statement giving the original belief a new meaning, the outcome will change.
Examples.
“I am told I am bad, I am a control freak.” Reframe, “You must be good at organising a diner party”
Belief change, “It is good to be a control freak sometimes.”
“Nobody loves me, nobody telephones me.” Reframe, “At least you get a good nights sleep, no phone calls at 2 in the morning.”
Belief change, “Poor, guy, he gets calls all through the night, and a poor nights sleep.”
NOTE
See Context Reframing and Content Reframing
Further to my article Prozac, Seroxat, Effexor and Serzone, do they work? and the follow-up NLP, Alternative Therapies against Antidepressants, the British Guardian newspaper published an article titled “Drug firms face new laws on test results“.
I heard about this article whilst listening to the BBC Radio Five Live breakfast program, just a few words as they reviewed the morning’s newspapers, and they inferred that the British Government would be bringing in new laws requiring drug companies to publish ALL research results from clinical trials.
The article did not say that. What it did say is :-
“The health minister Dawn Primarolo will tell MPs (Members of Parliament, the British Government) that new legislation will be introduced by the end of the year to ensure drugs companies pass on results of clinical trials as soon as the alarm is raised about one of their medicines.”
and that
“The minister will announce that new legislation will be introduced by the end of the year placing a greater obligation on companies to disclose results of trials.”
Note the words “a greater obligation“, they infer, that a drug company only has to inform the British Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Authority (MHRA), when there is a problem.
This action resulted from the antidepressant Seroxat, produced by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), where GSK had identified two problems in about 1998, being :-
1. There was a higher risk of suicidal behaviour among under 18’s using Seroxat rather than a placebo.
2. The antidepressant drug Seroxat was ineffective in dealing with depressive illness among under 18s.
It took until 2003 until the MHRA announced that doctors should not give Seroxat to the under 18’s.
The newspaper article goes on to say that in the USA, and agreement was made by GSK to publish ALL its’ trial results, available to the public, whether negative or positive.
How do we know, or in fact the prescribing doctors know, what these drugs are doing to us, what side-effects they are having?
what are these drugs are doing to us?
Perhaps alternative therapies, even if they are from the placebo effect, are better for us. (see www.nlpnow.net)
And come on Radio Five Live, do not twist an article to say what you want it to.
See article It is how you interpret what your modalities give you.
Booking on the Hypno-Cognitive Behavioural Therapy®, (HCBT) course, was to help me understand and put into practice what CBT (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy) is.
To understand the therapy, I firstly needed to understand the words used to describe CBT.
Cognitive refers to the way a person thinks about themselves, others and the world around them.
Behavioural how and what a person does, affects the way they develop their thoughts and feelings.
Therapy helps the person to change their world, preferably for the better.
CBT is known as a “talking” therapy, and deals with the here and now, unlike some other therapies which look for the cause of the problems and difficulties, by going back into the past, and even further back into past life. CBT looks for ways to improve the state of mind, now.
CBT is said to help people with mental health problems such as anxiety, depression, panic attacks, phobias, OCD (obsessive compulsive disorder), post traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia and eating disorders, and was developed out of Joseph Wolpe’s behaviour therapy in the 1950’s, combining Cognitive Therapy (CT) of Aaron Beck and Rational-Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) of Albert Ellis, and other psychotherapies treatments of that time.
By taking a situation or event, we will process this in our brains, and this will lead to us having thoughts about it, which could create emotions, give us physical feelings which will lead to some actions that we will take.
Perhaps a loved one has not telephoned as expected. This situation can be taken in many ways, and it is how the thoughts are processed that feelings and thus emotions and outcomes are generated.
Example 1
Situation No telephone call.
Thoughts Does not love me, they are out with another person.
Emotions Envy, jealousy, sad, upset.
Physical Feelings Crying, panic, feeling sick
Action Argue, retaliate.
Example 2
Situation No telephone call.
Thoughts He/she is in an important meeting.
Emotions Proud, supportive.
Physical Feelings Relaxed, feeling comfortable
Action Prepare a nice meal.
If we take the situation the wrong way, there could be a feedback system or looping, which will generate even more bad feelings, thus creating a vicious circle, leading perhaps to anxiety, stress, depression if not stopped.
CBT aims to break this cycle, by introducing, or in NLP terms reframing, alternative solutions that can be accepted by the client, by changing the way the situation is thought about (cognitive) and what is done about it (behavioural).
Typically a client will take the therapy for from six weeks or even six months, compared to perhaps one or two sessions with a competent NLP Practitioner.
An advantage of taking longer over the therapy (that is weeks) is that the client is monitored, but this also means the treatment is slow.
I recently attended a course run by Donald Robertson of the UK College of Hypnosis and Hypnotherapy, on Hypno-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy®.
It was I subject that I had little knowledge, having not worked to much degree in CBT (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy), (more to follow), it was a chance for me to educate myself, and learn from Donald Robertson, a person I have great respect, with his expert knowledge of hypnosis.
Donald did not fail me with his knowledge. He has research the field of hypnosis and it’s therapeutic powers for many years, and he can back-up his teaching with references to the greats of the hypnotic world, and even those before the name hypnosis was coined by James Braid around 1850. Names such as Aaron Beck and Albert Ellis, Hippolyte Bernheim and Ambroise Auguste Liébault of the Nacy School, Éva I. Bányai, Iving Kirsh, Dr Arnold Lazarus, Joseph Wolpe and Émile Coué, all slipped from his tongue.
CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy), (more to follow), is said to be a “talking” treatment that helps many people with mental health problems such as depression, anxiety, and eating disorders, and was developed out of Joseph Wolpe’s behaviour therapy in the 1950’s, combining Cognitive Therapy (CT) of Aaron Beck and Rational-Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) of Albert Ellis, and other psychotherapies treatments of that time.
As a treatment, CBT is being adopted into mainline medical interventions as it is reported to give good lasting results.
What Donald Robertson has achieved is to combine CBT with hypnotherapy creating the propriety model Hypno-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (HCBT)®, as he says the same way as hypno-analysis combines elements of psychoanalysis and hypnosis. But, HCBT is not just hypnotherapy plus CBT, it combines the proven, evidence based principles and methods into one model, as published by Iving Kirsh and others in 1996, which stated that between 70% – 90% increase in effectiveness could be achieved by integrating hypnosis with CBT.
The HCBT (Hypno-CBT)® model can be seen to be based on an ABC model.
The ABC model can be seen as A – Affect, B – Behaviour, and C – Cognition, where affect equals feelings, behaviour equals actions, movement, physical behaviours, and cognition equals how we talk to ourselves or inner dialog.
It is in the set-up or the initial interview between client and practitioner, that the ABC’s or in NLP terms modalities of both the “problem” and the “required solution” are sought.
Through the help of hypnosis and the use of relaxation, the ABC’s of the “problem” can be reduced and measured on a self-efficacy scale, – “on a scale 0-10 how do you feel about the situation now?” – using the positive ABC’s of the “required solution”.
Throughout the course, the similarities between CBT, HCBT (Hypno-CBT) and NLP were striking, although, NLP is often dismissed as a non accepted treatment, a quick fix, but when broken down into the basic elements, the structure were very similar, just different words and delivery methods.
A very worthwhile course to attend. Donald is a master. Contact him on
In recent days, reports were published regarding the effectiveness of anti depressants, (see blog) Prozac, Seroxat, Effexor and Serzone, do they work?
These studies were undertaken in the UK, USA and Canada by leading researchers including Prof. Irving Kirsh, from the department of psychology at Hull University (UK), and Guy Sapirstein, and published in the journal PLoS (Public Library of Science) Medicine, titled ‘Listening to Prozac but hearing placebo’ stating that when all research data was brought together, it appeared that patients who had taken antidepressants had improved, but then those taking a placebo or sugar pill improved just as much.
So where does this leave Alternative Therapies as against antidepressants?
There are so many “alternative therapies” out in the world NLP, hypnotherapy, TA, Gestalt, CBT, HCBT (Click for descriptions of therapies) and many, many more. It has been reported that there are perhaps more than 400 different therapies.
Taking antidepressants such as Prozac, seemed to the reteachers to have effect only on those clients who had or were in deep depression, with little or no effect on those with mild depression.
Taking Prozac, et al, also can give sufferers unwanted side effects, and it has been stated that, the occurrence of individual side effects in depressed subjects treated with fluoxetine (Prozac) and each comparator antidepressant have not been systematically investigated, but it has been reported by individual patients of having, insomnia, agitation, tremor and anxiety, and gastrointestinal adverse events, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, weight loss and anorexia. (Brambilla P, Cipriani A, Hotopf M, Barbui C. Department of Pathology and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. March 2005).
Why are antidepressants given by our doctors? They are easy to administer, the patient believes that they are taking a treatment to cure their state of depression, the pills are cheap, and being that in our society, many GP’s (General Practitioner – doctors), are only allocated a set time per patient, perhaps ten minutes, they have no time to offer alternative treatments.
So cost is major factor, as is time. But as shown by the report of Prof. Irving Kirsh, belief is perhaps the key to the success of the drugs, the belief of the patient that they are getting a treatment, known as the placebo effect.
Other alternative treatments can involve NLP, hypnotherapy, TA, Gestalt, CBT, CBH, etc, and typically a “therapist” would be with the client for say one hour per session, and in most treatments, the sessions between the therapist and the client will be spread over a number of weeks, costing money. Time a GP does not have and cannot take, and cannot allocate from tier budgets.
NLP, hypnotherapy, TA, Gestalt, CBT, CBH, et al, have been found to be an effective treatment for many psychological problems, but they are not a panacea, a cure all, an answer for anything, there is a place for drugs, for operations, and one treatment may be better than another in certain situations.
It depends upon the willingness of the patient or client to make a change in themselves, for example I cannot stop a person to stop smoking if they do not wish to.
I am often asked, “I want you to stop my partner smoking“. I ask, “Do they want to stop? If they don’t, then I can’t make them.”
It depends upon the knowledge of the “therapist” or “practitioner”, and their ability to use the skills they have learned.
It depends upon the congruence or trust between the client and practitioner. If the client does not trust or believe in the treatment or practitioner, then it will be very difficult.
“But where is the evidence?” This is a statement made by some people especially the medical profession, where everything needs to be evidence based, treatments have to be researched, documented and published. Well antidepressants had been prescribed on evidence based research, but most of the contrary evidence was not conveniently taken into consideration, as with Prozac, Seroxat, Effexor and Serzone and more.
Alternative therapies have been given throughout human existence, but especially with people such as Mesmer, Braid, Freud, Jung, Fritz Perls and more, each having their own understanding and methods of treatments.
Now, this is it, each works in their way, some yes better than others. For me I have studied at a deep level many treatments, including NLP, hypnotherapy, hypnosis, Reiki, TA, Gestalt, CBT, HCBT (Click for descriptions of therapies) etc, and so far they seem to work with no side effects and they are quick and last. I use what is appropriate at that time to me and the client. Each treat
ment seems to borrow from the next, some are exactly the same as another treatment but has been given another name.
Evidence? I will supply names of clients. If you want treatment from a practitioner, ask for references.
By the way, the best way to get out of depression is, firstly know there is depression, to take exercise, laugh, start to enjoy life, and change the state.
If you need help, and want to consider NLP, Hypnotherapy, HCBT or just want to talk, call on (UK) 0845 130 6213, Skype me @ NLPNOW, or email [email protected]. I can visit you, no matter where you are, for that one session to put you on the road you wish to travel.
Earthquake in the UK
I must have drunk too much tea last night before going to bed, as I needed to go to the toilet so many times during the night.
Listening to the radio, BBC Radio Five Live, all night with my little ear piece, I heard the news.
Just before 1am, the UK was hit by an earthquake, at 5.2 on the Richter scale, centered on Market Rasen in county of Lincolnshire in the East of England.
The UK is not susceptible to earthquakes, not laying on any major fault lines or the movements of the tectonic plates. But, about every thirty years, the UK experiences, what in UK terms is considered a major earthquake. The last one occurred 24 years ago, and measured 5.4 on the Richter scale.
Living in Kingston upon Thames, London, I felt nothing, yet on the radio, people from many parts of the UK reported feeling their beds move, windows and doors moaning, houses creaking, dogs barking and birds singing.
The last time I felt the Earth move for me was in Turkey. It was the only time I have experienced an earthquake. Sitting on a high stool, giving an NLP course in Ankara, (click for pictures), the chair began to move from side to side, just for a few seconds.
Last night nothing for me.